A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Criminal facts

around 15:30 on March 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at a business establishment specializing in “D,” located in Busan metropolitan area, where the Defendant: (b) was a small number of cases where the snow part of the victim E (n, 33 tax) visited from the place to receive a telegraph log; (c) laid down the chest part of the chest part by hand; (d) was the head of the fright, and the victim was the body of the victim and rejected, thereby covering the breast part; and (e) was covered by the buck part of the victim’s bridge; and (e) was fucked by the buck part, which was covered by the buck part while driving the buck part of the victim’s bridge; and (e) the victim was suffering from the victim.

The victim was forced to commit an indecent act, such as her panty off, her mathy from the spande to the mathy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A complaint, the list of reported cases, and photographs thereof;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's grounds for conviction of each investigation report are that the defendant did not have committed an indecent act by deceiving the victim's part of the defendant, and the victim's statement that the victim was forced to commit an indecent act is not trustable even if the defendant did not have a part of the defendant's sound, etc., but the hand was the same as that of the victim's sound, etc. during his massage place. The victim's statement that the victim was forced to commit an indecent act, even though the victim did not report it to the business owner immediately or

The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted by this court, the victim committed an indecent act by the defendant, who was off his clothes from the investigative agency to this court, was engaged in an indecent act by drinking the body and the body of the body of the defendant, etc., and made clear the defendant's refusal to report to the remaining owners of the business, and explained the circumstances to the husband of the victim who left the mast and was not immediately reported to the other owners of the business, and the husband resisted the husband to the owner of the business. Rather, the owner of the business did not get off his clothes of the guest while the math and the place of the business was in the place of the mast.

On the other hand, it was reported to the police immediately, and the defendant thereafter.