logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.08.29 2019고단448
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 30, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment was finalized on March 29, 2019.

The defendant is a person who actually operates the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. in the name of C.

On August 30, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the Defendant that “The Defendant would make a settlement in cash on the 10th of the following month on the face of delivery of red ginseng products, and on the 10th of the following month.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant was supplied with goods by many companies with bad credit standing and without any property and the obligation for the price of the goods was accumulated, even if he was supplied with the goods by the victim with the amount equivalent to KRW 198 million, he did not have the intent and ability to pay the price normally on the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceiving the victim, the defendant 466,00 won on August 30, 2016 and the same year.

9.2. 19,072,00 won, 34,720,000 won on November 27, 27 of the same year, and 33,670,000 won on September 33, 12 of the same year, and acquired financial profits equivalent to KRW 87,928,00 on a total of four occasions.

Around December 19, 2013, the Defendant stated that “Around December 19, 2013, the 2019 Highest 552” means that “A victim H has money to purchase and supply household supplies, but the purchase fund has to be borrowed money due to a temporary shortage of money, and he/she will repay the money without a mold ten days after the purchase.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was in a state of bad credit standing, and the office rent at the time was in arrears for not more than three years, and even if the Defendant borrowed the above money from the victim, such as the Defendant’s refusal to pay off the money with the check of the number of shares offered as repayment, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

The defendant.

arrow