(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고합586

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고합586

사기등

Text

The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the actual owner and captain of “D”, a fishing vessel.

1. On March 3, 2006, the Defendant presented a false statement of entry and departure necessary for the supply of duty-free oil to E as the victim, at the office of the Vindication-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Incheon, and at the office of the Cheongjin-gun, Incheon, the defendant presented a false statement to the effect that D exclusively engaged in the fishery, supplied duty-free oil to request D to supply duty-free oil.

However, the above D was not only engaged in the fishery but also engaged in the excursion ship business for transporting weather workers and the employees of the Korea Communications Corporation, so it was not possible to be supplied with tax-free oil.

The Defendant supplied a total of 38,11 liters for the fishing industry from around that time to December 31, 2010, such as the list of crimes (detailed statement of fuel consumption) in attached Table 2010, and acquired a total of 27,635,889 won of the market price.

2. On December 26, 2007, the Defendant: (a) made an illegal solicitation to the effect that the Defendant: (b) on December 26, 2007, the Defendant: (c) was working at the customer facility team of the Korea Communications Commission; (d) was in charge of telephone facilities, repair and lease contracts, etc. for vessels used by the employees of the Korea Communications Agency in islands and islands; (d) was not passenger ships; (e) was a vessel registered as a basic local government because it was engaged in fisheries in a coastal area; and (e) was not registered in the Korea Shipping and Port Authority; and (e) was not equipped with the terms and conditions of the vessel subject to the lease contract of the Korea TT, “ despite the fact that the employees of the Korea Communications Agency transferred KRW 450,000,00 in return for the transfer of KRW 450,00 to the agricultural bank account in the name of the said F; and (e) transferred the amount of KRW 10,000,000 on September 46, 2000.

2. Determination

1. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor on the part of the fraud.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2013.04.25 2012노4309

-전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.10.27 2015고단204

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.24 2013고단1035

-전주지방법원정읍지원 2016.08.17 2015가합378

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2015.08.11 2014고단543