The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 1, 2018, around 13:40, the Defendant intruded upon Mail through the gate opened in Seocheon-si C, Seocheon-si, and loaded the victim D’s market price at a level equivalent to KRW 300,000,000 in the victim D’s market price.

2. On June 1, 2018, around 14:20 on June 1, 2018, the Defendant intruded by the same method as the above paragraph 1 at the same place as the above paragraph 1, and carried the victim E-owned market price of KRW 200,000,000 in the victim E, and carried the out air condition onto the finger.

As a result, the Defendant invaded each victim's residence and stolen the property owned by each victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs and CCTV photographs related to crimes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (one million won in penalty, one million won in prison, and one million won in prison) of the suspended sentence are recognized and against the defendant's mistake.

It seems that there was no record of the same crime and no planned crime.

The amount of damage was not significant and the damage was immediately recovered.

In addition, the punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.