logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.03.26 2014고단172
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, each of whom shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A, B, C, and D H are visual disorders and are engaged in the business of operating the massage treatment establishment in the trade name of “J massage treatment establishment” on the 3th floor of the Masan-si I building of Changwon-si; K is an employee in charge of employment management, etc. at the above massage treatment establishment; L and M are employees in charge of customer response, calculation, etc. at the above massage treatment establishment; Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D are employees in charge of cleaning, customer guidance, contact transmission, collection, etc. at the above massage treatment establishment.

The Defendants conspired with H, etc. from March 25, 2013 to October 21, 2013, employed a female sexual traffic, such as E, on the condition that he/she would take half of the preparation against the said female, and had the female sexual traffic, who was receiving 170,000 won as the preparation against the per capita, and had the female sexual traffic, sexual intercourse with the guest, etc. engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic.

2. On September 26, 2013, Defendant E, at the 321st room of “Jama treatment place”, the Defendant engaged in sexual intercourse with non-customers on condition that 80,000 won should be borne by the business owner, thereby engaging in sexual intercourse.

3. On September 26, 2013, Defendant F, at the 10th room of the Jamashing (JA) around September 26, 2013, the Defendant expressed a bath to the needy customers on the condition that 30,000 won would be paid from the proprietor, and then, Defendant F engaged in sexual intercourse over two occasions in a manner that stimulates the sexual organ of the customers by using the misunderstanding day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. H:

K. Each police interrogation protocol concerning L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Articles 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., and Article 21(1) of the Criminal Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic.

arrow