beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall have the Cheongju District Court as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 12, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract to establish a lease on a deposit basis with Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) on the deposit basis for lease on a deposit basis, the duration of the lease on a deposit basis, the duration of the lease on a deposit basis by December 30, 2017, and the period of the lease on a deposit basis by Defendant B as Defendant B.
(hereinafter “instant lease contract”). (b)
Defendant B completed the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon on January 17, 2013 as the Cheongju District Court Branch No. 1281 as to each of the instant real estate by reason of the instant lease agreement.
(hereinafter “Registration of creation of chonsegwon”). C.
Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) concluded a loan agreement with Defendant B, and subsequently entered into a loan agreement on August 11, 2014, the registration of the creation of the instant chonsegwon with an additional entry on August 11, 2014, and completed the registration of the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis with Cheongju District Court KRW 65,00,000, the obligor B, and the mortgagee C’s establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis.
On July 17, 2015, the Plaintiff and Defendant B agreed on the instant lease agreement, and the Plaintiff returned all the deposit money to Defendant B on September 9, 2015.
E. On February 8, 2017, Defendant B repaid to Defendant C all the secured claims against the registration of the establishment of the neighboring mortgage.
[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and 9 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, Defendant B is obligated to perform the procedure for cancellation registration of the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon in this case, and Defendant C is obligated to express its consent on the cancellation registration of the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon in this case as a third party who has an interest in the registration of the establishment of chonsegwon in this case.
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.