logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.07.19 2013고정386
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:00 on April 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s drinking alcohol in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on the ground that the victim was not the Defendant’s telephone; (b) found the 2,460,00 won at the market price of the skin management machinery DPS; and (c) 1,816,000 won at the price of cosmetics such as Aroma, and damaged the 4,276,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Considering the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the same criminal record for the reason of sentencing, reflects the fact that the victim does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim, and the damage was fully recovered through conciliation in civil procedure.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 10:00 on April 30, 201, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s drinking alcohol in Seo-gu Daejeon C Victim D, Seo-gu, Daejeon on the ground that the victim did not have the Defendant’s telephone; and (b) committed assault upon the victim’s head and her head to drink.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place, threatened the victim F, who was a customer with whom the skin was exposed, with the phrase “I wish to be killed, I would like to see what kind of harm to the victim’s body.”

C. At around 01:00 on June 1, 2012, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim D was not subject to the phone call, she fladddd the victim, and she fladdddd the victim, saying, “In this time, she was found to have died of the death of Daejeon. Badh, Badh, Badh, Madh, Madh, Madhh, Madhh, Madh, Madhh,” and expressed the attitude of threatening the victim

2. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Articles 260(1) and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act.

arrow