A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Criminal facts

On April 30, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving) at the Daegu District Court on April 30, 2009; on April 6, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months; on June 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving) at the Ulsan District Court on June 13, 201, and two years for a suspended sentence of six months.

On October 14, 2017, 03:30, the Defendant driven B car volume from the car parking lot in SK located in the Nam-gu industry, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, to the two king distance located in the same industry, from approximately 1 km to the two king distance in the same industry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking, a report on the situation of the driver under driving under the influence of alcohol, an inquiry into the vehicle, and a control-related photograph;

1. Previous conviction: Inquiry about criminal history and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes reporting criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Normal circumstances that are favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of volume: The defendant has a family member to support the crime of this case, and appeal against the wife: The defendant has a total of six criminal punishment records including the two times of suspended sentence on account of drinking driving, and there is a serious social harm on drinking driving, and there is a need to punish the recidivism, and the other defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the same as the order.