The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of eight months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is recognized that the defendant reflects the crime of this case in depth, the driving without a license does not cause a traffic accident, the driving distance is relatively short, the elderly's attachment should support the crime of this case, and the social relationship is obvious.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had a previous record of driving alcohol twice or more; and (b) the Defendant again committed the instant crime of driving alcohol without a license without being aware of the sentence sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment on October 26, 2017 due to the crime of driving alcohol on not less than two weeks; (c) the driving of drinking alcohol is a crime that may cause serious harm to an unspecified person; and (d) the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant crime was not insignificant to the degree of his driving; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) all other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, including the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.