beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
No person shall take in or inhale Toluene, which is a chemical that causes entertainment, hallucation, or anesthesia, or possess it for such purposes.
around 05:30 on August 31, 2018, the Defendant inhaled the above Toluene by inserting the 4th floor of the C Building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, in a manner of 50 square meters, 650 square meters, d-5250 square meters, 1 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patch d-3 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patch d-3 of the Patch d-5250 of the Patb.
"2018 Highest 4686"
1. Around 20:00 on July 28, 2018, the Defendant inhaled the above Toluene by inserting one “X-66” unit in the front park located in the city of Vietnam, a procin, in a vinyl fluor, into a vinyl fluor, and in a manner of exposinging and hiding it at the entrance of the given vinyl fluor.
2. On July 30, 2018, at around 10:00, the Defendant inhaled one main d'X-66' in the same manner as the statement in paragraph 1 at the place indicated in paragraph 1, where the Defendant inhaled the above Toluene.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 4574"
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;
1. Hestic substances referring to the 2018 Highest 4686";
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A reply to a request for a State and a riverine appraisal (A);
1. Application of immigration Acts and subordinate statutes on individuals;
1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the Chemicals Control Act and Article 22 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting a crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;
1. Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [A prosecutor seeks forfeiture of evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (the plastic paper used for the intake of main and dials) seized in relation to the case 4574 above [the prosecutor]. However, according to the disposal photographs and disposal records submitted by the prosecutor as evidence, the above seized articles are already discarded under the prosecutor’s direction (the total list of seized articles).