The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is a favorable condition that the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects on the fact that the Defendant did not lead the instant crime, that the actual distributed criminal proceeds were merely a part of the amount of damage, and that there was no record of domestic punishment.

However, the crime of this case is committed in a systematic, planned, and repeated manner against many unspecified persons and has great harm to society, and is not highly good in quality of crime, the victims have not recovered from damage, and the role of the defendant's cash withdrawal liability in telephone financing fraud is small, etc., and other unfavorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, and the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court (one and half years from June to June) are applied, and thus, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.