A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2014, at around 20:20 on May 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) laid a cell phone in front of the exit area of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 160, the subway lines 2, and 9, the Defendant: (b) laid a cell phone in front of the exit area of the subway lines 3; and (c) laid the cell phone in front of the exit area of the subway lines 3; (d) laid the cell phone in front of the opening area of the Defendant; and (e) laid the cell phone in front of the opening area of the Defendant, the Defendant stolen one cell phone

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the counter investigation of victims and the failure to prepare a suspect's identity guarantee);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence for the sentencing criteria [the scope of the recommended sentence] [the scope of the recommended sentence] the basic area (8 to 2 years) of the basic area of the theft of general property from Type 3 (large Larceny) (no person specially punished);

2. Determination of sentence of this case is not good for the nature of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant is currently illegal aliens: Provided, That the defendant is against the crime of this case, there is no specific penalty power for the defendant, the damaged goods have been temporarily returned to the victim, the age of the defendant, character and conduct, etc. shall be determined by the sentence like the order, taking into account all the conditions of sentencing prescribed in