A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00, at a “D” restaurant operated by the Defendant located in Ansan-si, and (b) at the same time, the victim E (the age of 19) who is a fluor, a fluor of the Defendant’s friendship with the Defendant’s friendship, expressed the victim’s desire to do so while under the influence of alcohol; (c) at the back of the fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous thing; (d) fluor, fluor of the victim’s head by fluoring the fluor’s head, and fluor of the victim’s head by fluoring the fluor’s head on several occasions; and (d) fluor’s head by fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous thing after shouldering the said fluor’s head.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them about two weeks of treatment to the left-hand side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate of injury, report on internal investigation (Attachment to the scene of special injury and photographs of damaged victims), and report on investigation (Attachment to photographs of victims);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small quantities committed violence by the Defendant on the ground that the victim was satisfyed with her her friend and her friend.

At the request of the defendant, even though the victim made a phone call to the victim's relative, he continued to use violence while threateninging the victim's disease, and he opened the victim's left head.

In light of the tools used for the crime and the damaged parts, there was a risk of serious harm to the victim.

In the past, the defendant has been subject to juvenile protective disposition due to injury, etc.

B. The Defendant did not only deny part of his criminal act during the investigation process, but also demanded the victim to contact with the victim and make a false statement in accordance with the content of his/her statement.

. These actions.