The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

Punishment of the crime

Around 1:05 on April 29, 2020, the Defendant received 112 report from the Defendant and a de facto related person C, who was sent to the site, and was asked by the Party D in the Budget Police Station D Zone D, who was called to the site, on the background of the occurrence of the instant case from E slopeF, “Ne is a police officer. I do not see why she is a police officer. I do not see. I do not see. I do it . I do not see. I do not see. I do it. I do not see. I do not see. I do not see. I do not see. I do not agree with the lower court’s judgment. I do not agree with the lower court’s judgment. I do not agree with the lower court’s judgment.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the defendant's legal statement F and the police statement C;

1. The obstruction of performance of official duties shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account various sentencing factors, such as the scope of recommendation [the category 1] [the scope of recommendation area and recommendation] basic area (no special person)], the police officer who performs legitimate performance of duties by taking uniforms of the decision of sentence six to one year and six months of imprisonment, the degree of violence is not serious, the defendant again committed a crime even though he was sentenced to the suspended sentence of imprisonment for a similar crime in 2018, the defendant appears to reflect the criminal act, the defendant's age, family relationship, health status, occupation, environment, etc.