logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.07.06 2017가단25944
부동산명도 등
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 1, 2015, the Plaintiff leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to Defendant B by the end of May 31, 2017. The lessee cannot be deemed a sub-lease, transfer, or collateral without the lessor’s consent. If the lessor or lessee fails to fulfill the terms of this contract, the other party agreed that the lessee may give written notice and terminate the contract (Articles 3 and 7 of the lease agreement). Defendant C is currently running business on the instant real estate.

B. On June 9, 2017, the Plaintiff notified Defendant B that the lease contract will be terminated on the ground of the sub-lease without permission under Article 3 of the instant lease agreement.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the instant lease agreement was terminated on June 9, 2017 due to Defendant B’s non-performance of obligation due to the sub-lease without permission, and thus, Defendant B is obligated to restore the instant real estate to its original state following the termination of the contract, and Defendant C is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff as an illegal occupant.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff cites the claim on the ground that all the claims are reasonable.

arrow