logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.05.12 2015고단621
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 5, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on September 9, 201, a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine of KRW 1,50,00 as a crime from the

Criminal facts

1. On January 29, 2015, the Defendant, at around 22:35, driven a sports cargo vehicle B in the state of alcohol with a 0.151% concentration of blood algoan in the section of about 1km from the front of the water sking-dong Dotoke cafeteria to the front of the 12-2nd Escopic middle school at Sinung-si.

As a result, the defendant was punished more than twice for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a sports cargo vehicle B.

On January 29, 2015, at around 22:55, the Defendant driven the foregoing cargo vehicle under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), with a view to having difficulty in driving normally, such as a string distance, and led the Defendant to drive the said cargo vehicle under the influence of normal conditions, and drive the said cargo vehicle under the influence of 12-2, the upper right road of the 12-2, the upper right road of the 19-2, the front right road in front of the Taem Apartment

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow-line is installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly drive the front-time and safely in compliance with the tea line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, while driving a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle on the opposite lane due to negligence in the center line while driving the motor vehicle, received from the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 36 years old) the driver in front of the right-hand side of the motor vehicle and received from the victim the driver in front of the right-hand side of the motor vehicle, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim E who was on board the motor vehicle.

arrow