The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case even though the punishment power has reached several times in relation to violence and was in office for a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, the frequency and method of the crime of this case, the degree of damage, and the fact that the defendant committed obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. as the grounds for favorable sentencing, the court below stated that the defendant did not suffer serious injury due to the crime of this case, that he did not agree with some victims, and that he would make efforts to solve the problems arising from the alcohol, and that the court below determined the punishment by comprehensively considering the circumstances, means, results, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the crime of this case. In full view of all the matters concerning the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, the above sentencing of the court below is deemed appropriate, and the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.