logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.28 2015고단556
폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of 100,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, it shall be gold.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:50 on October 19, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim C (the age of 27) who has avoided disturbance, such as eating food, and had the victim under the influence of alcohol without paying the price. On October 19, 2014, the Defendant used the victim C (the age of 27) who has prevented the victim from drinking on the side, stating that “the victim was dead,” and assaulted the victim by hand on three to four occasions the part of the victim’s chest by pushing the victim’s chest and walking the bridge.

2. Definating;

A. At around 01:00 on October 19, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim, on the front day of the front day of the front day of the Daejeon District Police Station D District E (year 42), a victim, who was reported 112, about 10 persons, from among the following: (a) 10 persons, walked at the victim’s slope E (year 42) of the Daejeon District Police Station D District, which was called the victim.

나. 피고인은 위와 같이 소란을 피우다가 출동한 경찰관들과 함께 대전 중구 F에 있는 대전중부경찰서 D지구대로 간 후, 같은 날 01:30경 위 지구대에서 위 C 등이 듣고 있는 가운데 상황 근무를 하면서 전화 상담 중이던 피해자인 위 지구대 소속 경위 G(45세)에게 "씹자슥, 개새끼, 씨발놈"이라는 등의 욕설을 하여, 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다

3. On October 19, 2014, from around 01:10 to around 02:20 the same day, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol in the zone D district of the Daejeon Middle Police Station, expressed a large amount of voice to police officers who were on duty in the said zone, and made a noise, such as lying away from her house to her seat, without going home without going to the patrol-dong, Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement of de facto exploitation;

1. Article 260 of the Criminal Act of this Act concerning criminal facts

arrow