logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.06.15 2020고단3
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

" 2020 Highest 3"

1. On April 15, 2010, the Defendant, against the victim B, called the victim’s telephone to the victim on an influencies (hereinafter “Influent City”) and filed a complaint with the owner of the house on the wind that is interrupted while doing construction work, but the owner did not promptly prepare 5.6 million won, he/she borrowed money. On the fifth day after the end of the construction work, the Defendant provided that he/she would receive money from the owner of another corporation’s house and repaid the money without fail.”

However, as a person with bad credit standing, the Defendant did not perform the construction work even after receiving KRW 2.1 million from C at the time, and at the same time filed a criminal complaint due to fraud, and at the same time assumed the obligation to return down payment equivalent to the same amount, while there was no property, and there was no certain income, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed amount as promised to the victim, since there was no other construction work that can receive the construction cost after five days, and in particular there was no other construction work that can receive the payment after five days.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 5,60,000 won in cash on the front of the road D located in the following city, in the following day from the victim around 12:00 on the same day.

2. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F, who was living in the Hasan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Hasan-si”), heard that the victim, who was G-friendly son, would promptly move into the H apartment in the Hasi-si (H apartment), and through G, asked the victim to promptly move into the Y apartment. The Defendant sent 4.5 million won to the account under the name of I, who was living in the Hasan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “Hasan-si”), and falsely told the victim through G that “I is well aware of the H apartment-related person I, who would promptly move into the Y apartment.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he wanted to consume it as an individual name, such as living expenses, and the above I requested the defendant who was a bad credit holder through his mother J without any relation to the above apartment.

arrow