logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.21 2017나2055429
기타(금전)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: each "Witness B" of the 6th, 7, 14, 20, 7, 5, 12, 21, and 8th and 20 of the 6th, 7, 20, 7, 5, 12, 21, and 8th and 20 of the 6th, as "Witness B of the 14th and 6th, as "Witness M of the 14th," and "the date of this decision" of 9th and 16th 17 of the 9th, as "the date of the declaration of the first instance," and except as follows, it is identical to the remaining part of the court's decision except for the part concerning "request for registration of transfer of ownership due to the termination of title trust" as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The 11th to 4th of the decision of the first instance court shall be as follows.

In light of the following facts: “B’s testimony on the process of selling the above apartment under the name of the Defendant is inconsistent; the Defendant also stated that B cannot purchase the above apartment under its own name in the process of being investigated by the investigation agency, etc., and the actual right holder of the above apartment was submitted the confirmation document to the effect that B is B, in the first instance court, it is difficult to believe that the testimony of the witness B to the effect that B donated the above apartment was not trusted to the Defendant, and that there was no evidence to acknowledge that B donated the above apartment under the name of the Defendant, and that there was no evidence to acknowledge that B gave rise to the total amount of the down payment29,517,00, 517,000, 61,25,300, 907, 907.

2 The remaining criminal proceeds.

arrow