1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 1, 2014, the Daegu District Court E, F (Dual) and the auction case of real estate rent as to real estate stated in the separate sheet, the amount of KRW 3,545,618 to Defendant A (person holding the provisional attachment) was distributed (17.72%) and the amount of KRW 21,266,266 to Defendant B (person holding the provisional attachment) was distributed (17.72%) and the amount of KRW 19,671,296 to Defendant C (person holding the right to demand distribution) was distributed (17.72%) and the amount of KRW 9,463,562 to Defendant C (person holding the provisional attachment) were distributed (10.98%) and the distribution schedule was prepared to Defendant D (person holding the right to demand distribution) the amount of KRW 8,860,945 (17.72%).

B. On October 7, 2014, the Plaintiff appeared on the aforementioned date of distribution and stated an objection that the dividend amount against the Defendants is unreasonable, and filed the instant lawsuit on October 7, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] No dispute, Gap 2, 9 evidence, Eul 4 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion argues that since the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is false or should be revoked by fraudulent act, the distribution schedule should be revised to delete the distribution amount against the defendants and distribute the money to the plaintiff.

However, in light of the descriptions of Gap evidence 5 to 8, Eul evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 and 2, it is difficult to recognize the plaintiff's assertion.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.