logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.18 2017노910
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강간)등
Text

Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") (the crime of subparagraph 1 of the judgment: imprisonment with prison labor for three years and the other crimes in the judgment: 9 years, etc.) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant of this case recognized the crime of this case, thereby against his mistake, expressed his intention to divorce with the victim's father and will to give all property to the victim, and is trying to recover damage. The crime of Article 1 of the decision of the court below is in a concurrent relationship between the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (voluntary indecent act by blood) with the crime of violation of the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and the crime of violation of the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and the crime of violation

On the other hand, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence due to several indecent acts committed by the victim who was diving and was released, and began to commit another indecent act without any scambling or scambling any scambling scamblingly against the victim even though she had been on the scambling, which became final and conclusive after the suspended sentence, and committed an indecent act against the victim several times during the suspended sentence, and committed an indecent act against the victim several times. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant who was responsible for protecting the victim in order to physically and mentally grow up as a buble site, and rather, committed an indecent act and rape against his own distorted sexual desire. The crime of this case was committed by the victim, which is extremely poor and against human nature, and the victim seems to have suffered physical pain along with his kken sexual humiliation. In the future, it seems that it would be difficult for the defendant to have suffered any injury from the victim.

arrow