beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. In the instant case, the Prosecutor alleged that the Defendant should be punished as “inflicting” by applying Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act. The gist of the facts charged is as follows.
The Defendant and B (in the case of CB, the Defendant is a man who is over 80 years of age at the time of the instant case. In the instant facts charged, although his qualification (the status) was referred to as the “victim,” the above title is not appropriate in the instant case where the final judgment of innocence was rendered, and thus, in the following cases, the Defendant and B was referred to as the “offender” for convenience. However, the instant police report was made but did not constitute a complaint. However, the instant case was dealt with as the police recognition case, and was known to each other, is a relation between the people living in the same Dong and Dong.
On June 12, 2019, at around 16:30 on June 12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) carried the gate in front of the Daejeon-gu D, Daejeon-gu, on the ground that the gate was carried by the complainant by visiting the gate in front of the gate, kid, sping, and kiding the gate; (b) carried the gate in front of the gate, and carried the gate over the floor, carried the gate’s left hand on two occasions with the gate; and (c) carried the gate’s hand over two occasions; and (d) carried the gate’s hand over the left hand and carried the
2. As to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel, the Defendant and the defense counsel set a disturbance, such as baring the Defendant’s neighboring gate by sticking the Defendant’s gate on the day of the instant case.
The defendant, who was in the house, could not live there, and the defendant said that "I would like to damage the other's house gate," the defendant called that "I would open the door and open the door, regardless of why I want this house gate, I would like to see why I would see."
The complainant has returned without any special response, and the defendant asserts that he did not know that he did not assault or injure the complainant as stated in the facts charged.
3. The judgment of the party members and the criminal procedure are involved; and