The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 21:10 on January 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) brought the Defendant’s bridge in front of the “D” restaurant located in Young-si, Young-gu, in front of the taxi; (b) brought the Defendant’s bridge, which the victim fights with E, in his/her hands; (c) brought the Defendant’s bridge, which the victim fights with E, in his/her body; and (d) brought the Defendant’s shoulder and parts of the victim, walking the victim on the back to the floor of the vehicle; and (d) brought the victim a injury, such as cutting off the mouth of the mouth area where treatment for about 84 days is necessary.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant consistently asserts that there was no assault against the victim, such as the victim’s going beyond or walking through the police, etc., and denies the facts charged.

B. In light of the evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the victim, E, G, and H investigative agencies and the victim’s injury diagnosis report, etc. are included in the evidence, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the record: ① The victim stated in the police that “I will not memory how the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case, but I will not be memory,” and that I would like to see that I would like to go beyond the floor of the instant case. However, in this court, the victim’s statement to the effect that “I would like to go about by a taxi, I would see himself, and I would like to go beyond the floor of the instant case. I would like to go back with the left breath and go beyond the bottom of the instant case. I would like to say that I would not see or go beyond the floor of the instant case.” The victim’s statement in the investigative agency and the statement in this court are inconsistent with the victim’s statement, and that I would not go beyond the victim’s right to walk with the instant facts charged.