1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Judgment on the main defense of this case

A. The Defendant’s assertion is unlawful as the instant lawsuit filed by a non-qualified person, on the grounds that the Defendant had entrusted construction work to C, who is the husband of the Plaintiff, and that there is no entry into a construction contract with the Plaintiff.

B. The defendant's defense is without merit, since he/she has standing to sue in a lawsuit claiming performance of judgment.

2. Judgment on the merits

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of the claim is that the Defendant is obligated to pay the construction cost of KRW 4.26 million, and the specific amount of the claim is as set out in the following table, as the Plaintiff received a request from the Defendant for the construction of clothing store interior interior decoration from September 25, 2017 to September 27, 2017.

(The claimed amount is calculated by applying the progressive rate to cost). The claim amount for the construction cost is consistent with the request made to the Defendant’s husband, who is the Defendant’s husband, for the construction work. Since 1.5 million won is limited to 3 and 1.67 million won for 1.5 million won for 1.68 million won for 1.88 million won for 1.7 million won for 1.7 million won for 1.23% for 1.35 million won for 1.1 billion won for 1.1 billion won for 2.3 billion won for 2.3 billion won for 27.7 million won for 2 billion won for 27.6 million won for 2 billion won for 2 billion won for 200 million won for 27.0 million won for 1,000 won for 1.6 billion won for e.g., e., e. 270 million won for e., e., e., the Defendant without any obligation to estimate e. 2 billion for e.