The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the number of buyers of the F apartment in Daegu-gun, the representative of the above apartment occupant countermeasure council, the defendant B is the operating committee of the above countermeasure council, and the victim G company is a corporation established for the purpose of housing construction project, etc., and the above apartment building is constructed and sold.

Since the defendants moved into the above apartment on July 2008, there have been disputes over various defects in the access road to the apartment, water leakage, poor drainage facilities, noise between floors, etc., and the neighboring sports facilities. On June 2009, the victim company had to bear enormous financial costs for the reason that the 148 households out of the total of 678 households of the above apartment was sold until then, as long as the defendants and the above apartment residents including the above apartment units were to get out of funds by entering into a lease contract for the unsold apartment units.

1. On June 5, 2009, Defendant B, along with H et al., an operating member of the above occupant countermeasure conference, was unable to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) the defect that the employee I, who was in charge of the sale, made it difficult for the said tenant countermeasure conference to remove the front section of the apartment lease contract with I, and the large sound, that the front section in the name of the said tenant countermeasure council is attached to the letter of guidance on the sale of the apartment lease contract.

Accordingly, the above defendant, together with the above H, interfered with the victim's duty of lease contract by force.

2. From June 5, 2009 to the end of the same month, the Defendants manufactured and installed a banner with the members of the said occupant countermeasures conference, stating, “I are difficult to keep the rent deposit, it is difficult to keep the rent deposit, and it may not receive any return of the rent deposit.”

Accordingly, the Defendants damaged the credibility of the victim company by spreading false facts together with the members of the above tenant countermeasures council.

3...