1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by applying the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the rejection of evidence additionally submitted by the defendant in the court of first instance for the following reasons.

2. Parts 2 to be removed or added; and

B. 1) Paragraph 1 is the same as follows. Registration completed under the Act on Special Measures is presumed to be a registration consistent with the substantive legal relationship. The presumption of registration of initial ownership or transfer is not reversed unless it is proved that a letter of guarantee or confirmation prescribed under the aforesaid Act on Special Measures is false or forged, or that it is not a legitimate registration made due to other reasons. The false letter of guarantee or confirmation refers to a letter of guarantee or confirmation that the substantive contents of the change in rights are inconsistent with the truth. Even if a person who completed registration under the Act on Special Measures claims that he/she acquired a right in accordance with other grounds for acquisition, it is apparent that the registration cannot be completed under the Act on Special Measures as of the date of the cause of acquisition at which the said Act is not applicable, or that the assertion is merely a mere fact that it is not a mere fact that there is no possibility to complete registration under the aforesaid Act on Special Measures, or that it is a mere fact that it is a mere fact that it is not a new 200,000,0000).

(b) subsection (a) of this paragraph.