The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On March 21, 2005, at around 21:48, A, an employee of the Defendant, loaded a substitute cargo on B5 tons of 10 tons of 11.09 tons of 2 axiss of 209 tons of 10 tons of 10 tons of 11.09 tons of 209 tons of 2000 tons of 1338-3, the flap, the flap of the voice-gun, the upper 338-3, the flap of the Defendant’s voice-gun-gun, the flap of the Defendant’s flap of the charges.

2. The prosecutor brought a public action against the facts charged in the instant case by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005; hereinafter “former Road Act”). However, the part that “where an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act due to the decision of the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 1014, Oct. 14, 2010; 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, and 70 of the same Act, the portion that “if the corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the same Act, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article” becomes retroactively null and void.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.