logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.29 2013고단891
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 15, 2006, at around 16:25, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of a vehicle by a road management authority, as his employee B, operated a vehicle with a 11.45 tons weight exceeding 10 tons of the restriction on the operation of a vehicle on both sides of the Korea Highway Corporation located in Young-si Highway Corporation located in the two places of business, the two places of business, the two places of business, the two places of business, the two places of business, the two places of business, and the two places of business

2. The prosecutor charged the facts charged in this case by applying Articles 86, 83(1)2 and 54(1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8681, Feb. 2008; Act No. 8664, Feb. 26, 2008; Act No. 8307, Feb. 29, 2009; Act No. 8307, Feb. 26, 2008; Act No. 9447, Feb. 22, 2009).

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow