Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the PC in the name of “C” on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. No one who provides games in violation of rating classification shall provide such games for the distribution or use, or display or keep for such purposes, the contents of which are different from the rating received;

Nevertheless, from October 4, 2019 to October 11, 2019, the Defendant provided a game product with contents different from the classification received by providing “99 game site”, which was classified by indirect charging method to acquire game money from an unspecified number of customers through a game after filling in the said PC, differently from the classification contents, by directly charging the game money in a manager page and allowing customers to use it. 2. No person is allowed to exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange, or repurchase the tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of the game product. Nevertheless, the Defendant, around 16:30 on October 11, 2019, exchanged the intangible result of the game that was acquired through a game site in cash.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and investigation;

1. Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 7, subparagraph 4 of Article 45, and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order seems to have been closed due to the instant case, and the exchange act was committed once.