logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2018.01.31 2017고단1471
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] The Defendant is a person who has received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking in drinking), and a summary order of KRW 4.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act on November 5, 2010 on the part of a person who received a summary order of KRW 4.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking in drinking), respectively, in the case of a person who received a summary order of KRW 4.5 million on August 27, 2010.

[2] On November 15, 2017, the Defendant driven a BM520 car under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.085% from the 2km section to the front road of the car industry company in front of the house in the natural stone-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, Nam-si, Seoul, to the front road of the house in the same city-ro 882.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (report on confirmation of such previous history);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. A comprehensive consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the circumstance in which the defendant, who has been punished several times due to the same kind of crime for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, committed the instant crime, has no record of being sentenced to more severe punishment than a fine due to the crime of drinking and the circumstance in which the defendant committed the instant crime, and there is no record of being sentenced to a

arrow