(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.12 2015가단519377

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.12 2015가단519377

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a non-corporate body comprised of owners and lessees of A 1 Dong store in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju.

A grass leaf leaf farming association acquired ownership of No. 101 and No. 102 of the first basement of the commercial building, and merged the above two houses on November 15, 201, and was divided into subparagraphs 101 through 107 on March 31, 2014 and owned until February 23, 2015.

B. D From January 2012, part of underground commercial buildings operated a fitness, and thereafter, Tracner E installed shower and electric measuring instruments for six months.

D From November 5, 2013 to November 4, 2015, the Defendant leased the above health room and shower room and operated the health room in the name of “F”.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3, 4, Eul 1, 2, Eul 1, Eul 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The argument related to the electricity charge of the shower room means that the plaintiff's executive body shall deduct the amount equivalent to the electricity charge used in the shower room from the electricity charge of the shower room. The shower room is attached to the shower room, but it is double imposing the electricity charge of the shower room separately from the shower room. Therefore, when imposing the electricity charge of the shower room, the electricity charge of the shower room should be deducted from the shower room. As a matter of course, the plaintiff shall deduct the electricity charge of the shower room from the electricity charge of the shower room among the electricity charge to be imposed in the show room as a matter of course, thereby causing damage to the plaintiff.

The amount is 7489kW used from September 2013 to February 2015 (i.e., 7,600kW -11kW). In the case of conversion into money, the amount is 1,100,883 won (=7,489kW x 147 won). Thus, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendant asserted that the electricity fee of the management room is applied to the Plaintiff’s executive department for the electricity used in the management room of the shopping mall of this case.

The electricity charge imposed on the health center shall be 20.0 per month.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원천안지원 2019.05.24 2018가합102464

-광주지방법원 2016.07.13 2015나53243

-부산지방법원동부지원 2014.08.22 2013가합100377

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.24 2018가단63502

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.11.22 2016고정184