1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 3, 2016, around 07:15, around 07:15, A was a person who was working for E in the Gu of Busan, and around October 3, 2016, at the camping site located in F of Busan, he was involved in an accident where the upper part of the upper part of the steel structure, which was dried up by cutting, was dried, and the upper part of the steel structure, kidd by cutting (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The instant accident was diagnosed by G Hospital as follows: “A was diagnosed by the G Hospital on the part of the 3rd degree of mack, excluding the brain fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, brain fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral

C. On October 17, 2016, A filed an application for medical care benefits based on the above diagnosis with the Defendant. On December 26, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the approval of medical care on the ground that there is a proximate causal link between the business and disaster with respect to “the 3rd degree video boom of the shoulder, excluding kniff and knife on the left hand, and excluding kniff and knife on the left hand,” among the above diagnosis on December 26, 2016 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). However, the Defendant rendered a disposition to not approve medical care on the ground that there is no proximate causal link between the business and disaster (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

A On March 17, 2017, upon objection to the disposition in this case, filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the said Committee did so.

7. 10. A rendered a decision to dismiss a request for review, and A has this effect in the same year.

8. 18. The instant lawsuit was filed.

E. On December 2, 2017, during which the instant lawsuit was pending, A died, and accordingly, Plaintiff C and D, who were the wife of the deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”), took over the instant lawsuit.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute exists or is obvious to this court, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion that they had worked.