logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.12.15 2017고단2518
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

[Defendant A and B] Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 26, 2017, at the top of the I Hospital located in G in Sung-gu, Sung-nam-si, G, the Defendants: (a) the Defendants are fighting with the victim's happiness and trial expenses on the ground that the Defendants are fighting with the victim's J (24 ) are click; (b) Defendant A is able to take the face of the victim's K (25 years ) one time at the hands of the victim's face; (c) the victim's face part is cleep once at drinking; (d) the victim's face part is click; (e) the victim's face part is flick at one time at the victim's bridge (24 years ); (e) the victim's face part is flick at one time; (e) the victim's face part is flick at one time; (e) the victim's face is flick at one time; and (e) the victim's face is flick at one at the victim's face;

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol for the examination of a police officer in relation to K,O, J, L, M, P, and Q;

1. Each police statement made against R and N;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Analysis of data from visual CCTVs) and report internal investigation (defluence analysis of damage by suspect);

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Defendant A, B: Each of the Defendant C, and D who is subject to imprisonment with labor: The choice of each fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (Defendant C, D)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A and B) of the suspended execution;

1. Social service order (defendant A and B) Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant C, D) have been committed several times by each of the Defendants is disadvantageously unfavorable, but all of the Defendants are against the mistake.

arrow