1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 2, 2012, the Plaintiff received medical care with the Defendant’s approval due to an occupational accident, such as “the complete cutting of a watershed in the first balance of revenues, the complete cutting of a watershed in the right side, the full cutting of a watershed in the right side, the damage of the upper part of the right side, the damage to the structural frame of the upper part of the upper part, the pressure breaking the upper part of the upper part, the damage to the pressure breaking the upper part of the upper part, the damage to the pressure breaking the upper part, the damage to the right-hand part, the external stress disorder, and the back part.”

B. On August 19, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits with the Defendant in relation to the foregoing occupational accident, and the Defendant rendered a disposition to determine the Plaintiff’s final disability grade 5 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the following grounds: (a) grade 5 applicable mutatis mutandis to the Plaintiff’s abnormal stress disorder; and (b) grade 14 grade 10 to the external stress disorder (a person who remains after the chronic symptoms in the national department).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 5 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) With respect to the pre-sale disability, the Plaintiff cut the lower part of the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part under the part

3) Therefore, the instant disposition, which was made on a different premise, ought to be revoked in an unlawful manner. (b) Determination 1 is as indicated in the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes. (c) According to the respective written evidence No. 2-1, No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7, as to the judgment on the Oral Sale Disability Grade A, the Plaintiff’s sell.