Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on Seoul Northern District on July 24, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 24, 2014.

"2014 Highest 756"

1. Around June 26, 2013, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, posted an article stating that “the sale of the main body of a medium-sized computer is made” on the Internet “Niberian” website at the Defendant’s house located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and made a false statement to the victim D who contacted with it, stating that “the sale of the main body of a medium-sized computer is made at the time of deposit of KRW 4,50

However, even if the defendant receives the price from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the thing as the promise.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was transferred KRW 450,000 from the victim’s account under the name of the Defendant.

2. On July 3, 2013, the Defendant posted a false letter at the place specified in the foregoing Paragraph 1, as described in the foregoing Paragraph 1, and reported this fact to the victim F, who made a false statement, stating that “If the Defendant deposits in advance KRW 50,00,000,000, the Defendant will direct trade and sell goods.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods as the promise.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was transferred KRW 50,000 from the victim’s account under the name of the Defendant.

3. On July 8, 2013, the Defendant, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the said paragraph, made a false statement stating that he/she would sell smartphones (gallon S3) on the Internet NAV online website, and that he/she would send 1.50,000 won to the victim G who visited him/her.

However, even if the defendant receives the price from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to send the thing as the promise.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it from the victim.