Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator of E in Fapo City D, and Defendant B is an employee of E Board.

1. Defendant A operated the above E-ray from October 2015 to November 201 of the same year, and from July 2016 to July 26 of the same month, Defendant A received 90,000 won from many unspecified male guests who found the above E-ray, and had them do sexual intercourse with B, an employee of the above E-ray, and had them do sexual intercourse, etc. for business purposes.

2. Defendant B, from October 2015 to November 201 of the same year, had been engaged in sexual traffic over 94 occasions by receiving KRW 40,00 of the price of sexual traffic paid by many unspecified male customers who found the above users, while serving as an employee at the above user for a total of 63 days from the first patrol officer of the same year to the first patrol officer of the same year, and from July 26, 2016 to the 26th of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on records of seizure, reply to requests for appraisal, details of sales of E-user cards;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (elective of imprisonment): Defendant B, Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (elective of punishment)

1. Aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging sexual traffic;

1. Defendant B: The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are to recognize and reflect the instant crime, and the same crimes are to be committed.