The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case, which is a summary of the grounds for appeal, is not unlawful since the Defendant’s crime of this case was committed in order to damage the banner installed by the Defendant’s husband and prevent the son from being injured by the Defendant, and constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate social rules.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant has used directly tangible force on the body of the victim by smugglinging the victim's parts, such as the defendant's arms, chests, and frys, in both hands, beyond blocking the victim from the victim and the Si Do Do Do . In light of the motive and background leading up to the above assault, the circumstances before and after the assault, the degree of the assault, etc., it is difficult to view the defendant's above assault act as a justifiable act

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.