The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On June 11, 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in C urban bus driving service, was driving the above urban bus around 18:40 on and around June 11, 201, and stopped at the bus stops of the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is 252-95, from the right edge of the old city road, to the right edge distance from the right edge of the old city road.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to check the safety of the driving route of the urban bus and to prevent accidents by checking the safety of the driving route of the urban bus through an accurate operation of the brake system for the persons engaged in driving of the urban bus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate without accurately operating the brakes, etc. while driving the bus as it is, and seeed the back part of the DK5 vehicle stopped in front of the direction of the city bus to the front part of the city bus, and went beyond the victim E (31 years old) and F (31 years old) on the roadway, and continued to go beyond the roadway, 70 meters by allowing the above victims going beyond the roadway to leave between the front part and the left part of the city bus's left side.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E, such as 12 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above, and the injury of the victim F, such as a thalone week of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the trial records, it can be acknowledged that the Defendant submitted each written agreement containing the intent of victims that the Defendant would not want the Defendant’s punishment on January 10, 2014, which is after the instant indictment. Thus, Article 327 of