Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On June 1, 2010, the Defendant is in charge of the design and structure of an exclusive type of automatic machine produced in the company as a researcher at a technical research institute after becoming a victimized company C, a corporation, and being employed as a researcher at a technical research institute.
In May 2, 2011, a person who retired from office in the same industry as the damage company is currently in office.
1. Crimes related to the external hard disks part;
A. Since the Defendant, in occupational breach of trust, has been aware that all the drawings of the machinery exclusively used by the victimized company are treated as confidential in the course of business and are prohibited from copying, copying, and taking out without permission, it is well aware of such contents, and prepared up up to the industrial technology security angle to protect trade secrets, the Defendant is obliged not to leak relevant data to the outside.
Nevertheless, around May 201, at the office of the technical research institute of the damaged company E located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) stored exclusive small-scale design drawings of the damaged company stored in its design computer drive in violation of its duty; (b) stored them in the hard disc with portable external capacity type; and (c) returned them to the damaged company without permission; (d) obtained the market value equivalent to the market exchange value of the trade secret of the victimized company by removing the total file amount of 204,595 entries in the list of crimes 1 without permission and by failing to return them to the damaged company; and (e) caused property damage equivalent to the same amount to the victimized company.
B. The Defendant, in violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act and occupational breach of trust, carried out any trade secret useful to the victim in the same manner as described in the preceding paragraph with a view to obtaining unjust profits or causing damage to the victim, and left the D company, which was a like competitor company of the victimized company, and was in charge of designing exclusive art machinery around August 201.