The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On June 20, 201, the Defendant: (a) using a computer installed at the Moel Information Center located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu; (b) on June 20, 201, the Defendant provided a living together with the Defendant by making an agreement to understand each provision and faithfully implement it as follows; and (c) from May 201, the said parties shall, under the agreement, make a return on marriage and marriage in return for the promise to enter into a living together with the Defendant.

“A letter of performance to the effect that it is called” was drawn up and printed out two pages, and around that time, F’s seal imprint 2 F of F was stamped by name.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of holding the event, committed a set of two copies of the performance, which is a private document in F’s name, respectively.

2) On February 22, 2012, the Defendant, using a computer, drawn up a “creditor A, debtor F, and F, F, and F,” and around that time, the Defendant affixed F’s seal impression to F, name, next to the debtor’s name, from 105 of the front-si G loan in the front-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a copy of the F’s private document, which is a private document on the rights and obligations in the F’s name for the purpose of the event.

3) On August 28, 2013, the Defendant forged a copy of the F’s loan loan certificate in F’s name for the purpose of exercising the right in the same manner as that of the foregoing Section 2 at the office of a construction enterprise located in B, Busan-si, Seoul-si, Seoul-si, with the aim of exercising the right in accordance with the foregoing Section 2.

B. On October 27, 2014, the Defendant, at the Jeonju District Court, filed an application for provisional disposition prohibiting transfer or disposal of corporeal movable property with F with the Jeonju District Court for a provisional disposition (2014KaMa3659), and a claim for return of loan (201517, a lawsuit claiming the return of loan (2014GaGada 11517), and held each of the following events by submitting a forged performance letter (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”) and each of the loans (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”).

2. Determination

A. The defendant and his defense counsel.