The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court against the accused (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance such as the defendant's confession of all of the crimes of this case, the victim H does not want punishment against the defendant, the defendant does not want to have the same criminal records, and the case of 2013 Go-Ma707 was occurred in the process of guiding F, a private village student. The case of 2014 Go-Ma36 is deemed to have occurred in the process of preventing bullying from being bullying from the victims. It is reasonable that the defendant's bullying, which the defendant was known to the normal level, was likely to have occurred in the process of preventing the crime of this case, and there are circumstances that can be considered in the circumstance leading to the crimes of this case, the defendant's intellectual disability 3 disability. However, each of the crimes of this case is a crime of this case committed by the defendant against some victims, and it is not appropriate in light of the situation of the crime of special larceny, the defendant did not know about the victim of this case during the period of repeated crime, and there are no circumstances that the defendant did not reach the age of the victim and his defense counsel.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the part of the criminal records against the defendant stated in the third to fourth is corrected as being transferred to the first head of the crime column of the judgment of the court below).