A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 2. 7. 01:40경 고양시 덕양구 화정동에 있는 경기고양경찰서 형사과 D팀 사무실에서, 피고인의 폭행 피의사건을 수사 중인 경장 E이 피고인에게 사건경위를 묻자 술에 취해 “당신은 내가 말하는 대로 조서만 꾸미면 될 것 아니냐 뭘 자꾸 물어보냐 ”라고 소리를 지르므로 같은 팀 소속 경사 F이 피고인에게 다가와 “좀 진정하시고 차분히 말씀해 주세요.”라고 말하자 “넌 뭔데 그러냐 넌 뭐냐고 ”라고 소리를 지르며 손으로 위 F의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고 손바닥으로 얼굴을 1회 때리는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄의 예방ㆍ진압 및 수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Securing and analyzing CCTV of a DNA team);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The act of assaulting a police officer who performs official duties in sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and attempting to challenge the legitimate execution of official duties shall be punished accordingly.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the age of the defendant, criminal records, family relationship, circumstances and contents of the crime, and all other sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant is divided and reflected in the mistake, and the degree of violence is relatively minor.