logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.11.27 2014고단1813
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 7, 2004, at around 10:35 on June 10, 2004, the Defendant’s employees violated the restriction on vehicle operation by operating the B truck belonging to the Defendant exceeding the weight at the store of the branch of the Southern Sea Highway.

2. The part concerning a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which applies to a summary order subject to review, has lost its effect retroactively with the decision of unconstitutionality rendered on Oct. 28, 2010 by the Constitutional Court, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow