A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2017, at around 23:10, the Defendant took the 15:00 day before the center of the victim D (76 tax) located in C of the South C of the same day from the injured party on the ground that he is a disabled person or a civilian on the same day, and the Defendant took the 15:00 day, saying, “B, the head of the gue and the head of the Sie”, and the Defendant took the front of the victim’s house, and went back to her house in the vicinity of the victim’s house that the victim would not get out.

The Defendant continued to listen to the sound of the victim and the victim's wife E in front of his own house and take the examination knife of himself, and then go out of the house and the victim move together with a knife (20cm in total) which is a dangerous object on the kitchen of his own house, and then put the knife out of the house and the victim move together, and put the above knife with a knife with a knife knife knife of the victim's knife toward the upper part of his arms, thereby making the victim knife the above knife with a knife for about four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (to attach a knife photograph used by the person at the time of committing the crime) and the knife photograph attached thereto;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of a medical certificate) and a medical certificate attached thereto;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. It is advantageous to the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Code is the confession of the sentencing, the circumstance leading to the crime by neglecting the victim's speech and behavior while under the influence of alcohol, the circumstance leading to the victim's deposit of KRW 3 million for the victim, the father of the elderly suffering from dementia, the fact that the father of the elderly suffering from dementia is not good, the fact that there is no other criminal history other than the fine imposed once in 1986 due to the violation of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, and that the defendant's village residents (109 residents) want to find the wife against this defendant.