logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.6.11.선고 2020고단398 판결
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)[일부인정된죄명·교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)],도로교통법위반·(음주운전)
Cases

200 Highest 398 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death or Injury)

Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and Road Traffic Act

(Food Driving)

Defendant

Driving (one-time) 72.Wool

Residential Ulsan

Prosecutor

Park Jong-young (prosecution) and public trial

Defense Counsel

Law Firm*

Attorney Choi*

Imposition of Judgment

June 11, 2020

Text

Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three years.

Reasons

Facts of crime

피고인 은 ## @ ####호 모닝 차량 의 운전업무에 종사하는 사람이다. 피고인 은 2019. 9.23.21:45경 혈중알콜농도0.062% 의 술 에 취한 상태로 위 차량 을 운전 하여 울산 북구산음3길 16에 있는 울산스포츠과학고등학교 앞 도로를 무룡교차로 방면 에서 신명동 방면으로 진행하였다. 그곳 은 중앙 분리대가 설치되어 있었으므로 이러한 경우 자동차 운전업무에 종사하는 사람 으로서는 중앙 분리대 우측 부분으로 통행하고 전후좌우를 잘 살펴 안전하게 운전하여야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있었다.

그럼에도 불구 하고피고인은 술 에 취하여 이를 게을리 한 채, 그곳에서 음주운전을 단속 중인 경찰관 을보고 이를 회피하기 위하여 중앙분리대를 침범하여 진행한 과실로 피고인 의 진행 방향전방에서 차로를 따라 직진 하던 피해자 이피해 (가명, 여, 59세) 운전의 $$$$$$ 호 i30차량 의 전면부를 위 모닝 차량의 전면부로 들이받았다. 이로써 피고인 은 위와 같은 업무상 과실로 피해자 이피해에게 치료일수를 알 수 없는 우측 늑골 골절상 등 을, 위 모닝 차량의 동승자인 피해자 서자녀(가명, 여, 16세)에게 약 12 주간 의 치료가 필요한 흉추 골절상 등 을 각각 입게 하고, 피해차량 의 동승자인 피해자 이동승 ( 가명, 53세)으로 하여금 그 자리에서 심폐정지로 사망에 이르게 하였다.

The summary of evidence (to be omitted)

Application of Acts and Subordinate Statutes

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Caused by the Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 3(1), the proviso to Article 3(2)2 and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 268 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 148-2(3)3 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving);

Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of a punishment;

In regard to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Handling of Traffic Accidents (Death) imprisonment without prison labor and the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, each choice of imprisonment with prison labor shall be made.

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 38 (2), and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Grounds for sentencing: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than one month nor more than six years;

2. The scope of recommending sentences according to the sentencing standards1).

[Determination of Type] Traffic Accident: General Traffic Accident (Type 2)

【Special Sentencing Sentencing】

- Reduction Requirements: Non-Punishment

-Aggravated factor: Drinking

[Scope of Recommendation and Recommendation Form] Basic Area, 8 months to 2 years of the Treasury

[General Sentencing]

- Mitigation element: Subscription to comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and no record of criminal punishment;

- Aggravations: Central Line Offense

3. The crime of this case committed by the sentence of sentence is committed by the police officer who is under the influence of alcohol while running a vehicle under the influence of alcohol while the defendant was driving, and the driver of the damaged vehicle is dead, the driver of the damaged vehicle and the Dong of the damaged vehicle are seriously injured, and the result is serious, and the crime is also serious: Provided, That the defendant's mistake is recognized and against the defendant's mistake, the victim's bereaved family members and the victim's victim's children and the victim's children, the victim's children and their children are covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance; the deceased's failure to wear safety level at the time of the accident appears to have been partially negligent in expanding the damage caused by the accident; the victim's taking into account the circumstances such as the order, character and behavior of the damaged vehicle; and the order of the defendant;

Judges

Judges Kim Jong-hwan

Note tin

1) The instant crime does not apply to the case where a regular competition exists and the sentencing criteria are not applied, but serious transport staff.

It refers to the sentencing criteria for the crimes of violation of the Special Act on the Settlement of Accidents (Death).

arrow