logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.19 2017고단930
특수절도미수등
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum of one year and eight months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for a maximum of ten months and six months, and Defendant A’s imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 930] - Defendants

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendants A, B, and E;

A. On February 10, 2017, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Special Misappropriation and Violence, etc. Act (damage to property, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as joint property), and at the 12-dong parking lot located in the south-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City, 1186-ro 1186, Defendant B and E, while Defendant A, by discovering a private taxi owned by the victim F, was unable to find money and valuables by using the stone.

As a result, the above Defendants attempted to steal the victim's property by destroying the glass of the taxi driver's seat owned by the victim with which the market price cannot be known in collaboration with E, but did not bring about such intent.

B. Special larceny Defendants, along with E, tried to steal the victim H’s automobiles and credit cards, the father of E.

Therefore, at the house of the E located in the Nam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City around 22:50 on February 21, 2017, the said Defendants cited the next key and credit card from the main machine of the victim to the string the gap in which the victim was diving, and the Defendant A got the said key from E, and then got the said key back to the victim’s own market price of KRW 3,00,000, which was parked in front of the house of the E, and driven the automobile with Defendant B and E aboard.

Accordingly, the above defendants stolen the victim's property together with E.

(c)

On February 21, 2017, the Defendants violated the law of the finance industry specializing in credit and committed an act in the L station located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, as if they had the intent or ability to pay the price, and the name of the injured party cannot be known. B. The said Defendants’ de facto change the gasoline amounting to KRW 50,000 on the car stated in the port. The said Defendants presented the new card owned by H as their credit card.

arrow