The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (2 million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the Defendant is against the recognition of the instant crime, the nature of the instant crime is poor and the risk of repeating the crime appears to have been high since he/she had been tried for two times as a traffic-related crime and had a record of being punished twice, and he/she had been tried for driving under the influence of drinking. In full view of the following: (a) there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s sentencing conditions; and (b) there is no change in the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) various sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.