The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On August 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased 139 square meters and a single-story agricultural production facility (ware) from F in Sejong-si, Sejong-si; (b) explained that the Defendant’s mother and Do governor would remove the housing of Sejong-si, Sejong-si, the neighboring land from F (hereinafter “instant building”); and (c) accordingly, the Defendant had D remove the said building without knowing that it was owned by others (E).

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below stated that "E purchased the building of this case from F around 2002, and thus the above building is owned by E," and the police stated that "F, around 2002, sold the building of this case to E with the content of transferring the ownership of the building of this case, instead of repaying debts to E," and the contents of the real estate sales contract (Evidence 4 pages) signed between F and E correspond to the above E and F on October 11, 2002, and ② The police knew that "F was accompanied by the building of this case to B, as the defendant was aware of the building of this case as F and was connected to the building of this case," which is inside the police station to the effect that "F was not in possession of the building of this case or in possession of the building of this case," and that "the above real estate sales contract of this case and the building of this case were not in credibility and credibility in the above investigation agency."