1. The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The total cost of the lawsuit is the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Intervenor’s status as the Plaintiff are corporations established on December 28, 201 pursuant to the Act on the Establishment and Operation of National University Corporation A (hereinafter “A”), which conduct projects, such as fostering human resources, for the purpose of contributing to the development of the State and contributing to the prosperity of human beings by using approximately 2,800 full-time workers, pursuant to the Act on the Establishment and Operation of National University Corporation A (hereinafter “A”), and the Intervenor’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”), who was affiliated with the Plaintiff’s attached facilities and worked as office assistants on October 7, 2013, and retired from office as of October 7, 2015.

B. On February 6, 2015, the Intervenor filed a motion for correction of discriminatory treatment against the Intervenor (1) to treat the Intervenor disadvantageously to the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission compared to the Plaintiff’s corporate employees on February 6, 2015, the Act on the Protection, etc. of Fixed-Term and Part-Time Workers (hereinafter “ Fixed-Term Act”).

() The Plaintiff filed an application for correction by asserting that the treatment prohibited under Article 8 constitutes discriminatory treatment, and filed the application as “the date of discrimination: the date of occurrence of treatment from October 7, 2013 to the present”; and the purport of the application: the same treatment for the same business as “the same person subject to provisional comparison: A corporate employee”; 2) The intervenor, submitted to the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission on March 4, 2015, submitted the purport of the application to the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission on March 3, 2015, was equally paid to the Intervenor at a disadvantage compared to the comparable employee, and the Plaintiff’s failure to pay good pay, performance bonus, fixed meals, holiday leave expenses, and customized welfare expenses is a discriminatory treatment.

The plaintiff stated that the plaintiff shall pay the intervenor monetary compensation equivalent to the above basic pay, the bonus for good attendance, the performance bonus, the fixed meal cost, the regular leave cost, and the welfare points.

3 The intervenor filed with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission on March 27, 2015, and filed an application for correction of the amount of discrimination. "the plaintiff's purport of the application is from December 1, 2013 to April 6, 2015.